Over
the past four legislative sessions the Maine Economic Research Institute (MERI)
has researched and analyzed the potential economic impact of over 2000 separate
bills. The majority of these bills do not make it through the legislative
process; they are killed, dropped, or modified in a fashion that make them
insignificant from an economic or business climate point of view. Bills are
excluded that are too narrow in scope; do not impact a broad cross-section of
the economy; are not significant in its effects on the economy / business
climate; or do not affect a fundamental business principle. Bills that do not
result in a public record of votes taken (roll call votes) are also excluded.
Only bills that have a significant positive or negative impact on Maine's
economy (according to those issues identified as critical by Maine's employers
in MERI Senior Management Surveys—see: www.fixmaine.com)
are used in the final rating methodology. From 1999-2006, 223 roll call votes
(including both House and Senate) fit these criteria. Some long term legislators
have been scored in each of the four sessions.
Breakdown of bills by economic / business issue:
Business Regulation
30%
Worker's / Unemployment Compensation
25%
Healthcare
10%
Taxation/Spending
11%
Labor Issues
11%
Environmental
8 %
Economic Development
4%
Education
1%
Why
are these issues so important? Maine employers create and retain the jobs that
support Maine’s economy and provide opportunity for Maine's people. MERI's
selection of bills is a thorough and consensus process involving a broad
representation of Maine's entire economic base and many thousands of work-hours
in order to insure a fair and objective evaluation.
MERI’s
website has a description of every bill rated over eight legislative sessions
(119th, 120th, 121st, and 122nd
Maine State Legislatures). It is highly improbable that everyone would agree on
the selection of all 223 economic bills. One could discard a number of these
bills and the result would likely change the absolute score of individual
legislators, but would not change their relative position along the continuum of
scores significantly. This is exactly why we recommend to those who use MERI's
information that they should focus not so much on the raw scores but rather on
the relative position on the scale (Very Strong, Strong, Weak, Very Weak). The
methodology is substantive and accurate, particularly as there are more data
points for individual legislators.